So I buckled myself up, and sat in front of the computer for a few hours to extrapolate some of the data from the Multiple Listing Service (MLS).  For a numbers geek like me, it’s pretty interesting stuff. And if you’re not a numbers geek…you might be surprised to find, it’s not entirely boring.  Work with me here…

The Good

There is no doubt that certain communities have been more resilient over the course of this housing crisis than others.  In my recent post discussing the  product profile for new residential construction in Orange County, I discussed the uniqueness of the Irvine market.  It has some of the lowest distress numbers in South County and a buyer demand that is consistently selling out the newest construction projects.  Year-to-date they have had less than 7% of all closings listed as bank owned (foreclosed) property and 22% short sales.  With less than a combined total of 29% for properties closed that were ‘distress’ so far this year, Irvine is one of the strongest cities in the county.

The strength of the Irvine buyer demand may be attributed to the nationally renowned schools, the proximity to Chapman University and University of Irvine, and the attractive commute to many Orange County employers.

My suspicion is also that the buyer profile may have been stronger.  I’d need to do further research, but given the large amount of new construction sold during the boom years, I’m a little surprised to still see a relatively low default rate, or distress market, as compared to other areas in South County that grew up in the boom.

The Bad…Or At Least ‘Not So Good’

Some of the other cities have seen significantly higher numbers of distress sales – bank owned properties and short sales closed.

Lake Forest has seen some fairly dismal numbers at nearly 60% of their closings either bank owned or short sales, with a slight improvement this year so far at 55.9%.  It’s also interesting to note that while some cities (Mission Viejo and Rancho Santa Margarita) seem to be seeing a slight improvement in the percentage of equity sales (owners can sell for a price that covers mortgages and costs of sale) this year, Laguna Niguel and Aliso Viejo have seen decreases. Why?

We’ve seen that some of the higher price points have been stronger for longer.  In other words, it’s only been more recently that we’ve seen short sales or bank foreclosures to any great extent in the higher price points.  These neighborhoods may now be feeling that pinch.

CLICK TO ENLARGE

The Really Ugly

It’s interesting to examine the nature of the neighborhoods that have the highest number of distress inventories.  Upon examining a couple of the neighborhoods, it’s clear to me there are some very real reasons for the challenges some of these neighborhoods are facing.

CLICK TO ENLARGE

It’s important to know the following about the this chart – Ladera Ranch numbers include their gated community of Covenant Hills, and San Clemente’s overall numbers include their newest addition of Talega in their calculations.  For discussion, I’ve pulled out the specifics for both Covenant Hills and Talega.

It’s hard to ignore, out of the cities I profiled, the only one that didn’t have a lower percentage of bank owned homes (foreclosures) was Lake Forest, and certainly Lake Forest has really struggled with high numbers of distress throughout this market as well.

Growing Up In The Boom

I’m particularly interested in the makeup of Ladera Ranch, Covenant Hills, and Talega in this crisis, however.  These are neighborhoods that experienced unprecedented demand, and in the early years, unprecedented appreciation.  The product was new, architecture was unique, planning was exceptional, and it was highly appealing to the buyer profile of the day.  But the one commonality these neighborhoods also face is the fact that they literally grew up in the boom.

And in the case of Covenant Hills (which I intend to explore further in a future post) you have a community, a luxury one at that, that was just in the beginning stages of it’s launch.  And while the construction of the planned community, high-end tract homes, has nearly completed at this point, the high number of available empty lots slated for luxury custom builds, remains vast.

And when you have entire communities that are built in a boom, the overall impact of that bust can be devastating.    For a small community like Covenant Hills – the high end of Ladera Ranch – to see nearly 64% of it’s year-to-date sales as distress, the impact cannot be overstated. With Talega suffering over 60% of it’s closed inventory year-to-date as distress sales, there can be no question that this has dramatic impact on value.

Is There a ‘Good Deal’ for a Buyer Here?

Without a doubt, there are opportunities to get a ‘good deal’ in these neighborhoods.  In some of the hardest hit neighborhoods, prices have fallen and distress inventory is high.  So if a ‘deal’ is the goal, they are certainly here.

But I’m curious about your perspective as a buyer – and I’m interested in your feedback.  If you find a property that is 50% off it’s peak in Covenant how do you respond to that?  Do you feel like it’s a better deal than the property that is only 30% off the peak in another neighborhood – some parts of Irvine for example.

It’s an interesting concept to consider.  Every buyer I talk to has one request in common – a good deal.  I think that’s an important thing to define in your search for a home.  Is the ‘deal’ the predominant factor, really?  Is the long term value of the community a consideration?  Do the amenities impact your decision?

However, one may consider the long term prospective recovery in Covenant Hills as a real opportunity.

It really begs the question – from a buyer perspective, what do you consider a ‘good deal’ in this environment?

Short Sales and Volume

Some things to note from the above numbers, in 2008 the foreclosed/bank owned homes were the more common distressed property available.  In 2009 the tide shifted and short sales played a much more significant role, one which grew further this year.

Also, it’s interesting to note volume.  Nearly across the board, the number of sales increased from 2008 to 2009.  Jury is out for 2010 – but my personal opinion, given the expiration of the Housing Tax Credit, things may be fairly quiet for the 4th quarter of this year.

Jon Lanser with the Orange County Register recently did a post breaking down the number of sales and the change in median price per zip code that might be interesting to check out.

I also am leery of anyone claiming to be a short sale expert. Although there are some wonderful agents and representatives that are often assertive and diligent in their efforts, resulting in improved time frames for their clients, every bank is different and ever-changing, and the loans are often sold in the secondary market making the process very removed from the ability to directly to influence.

And while we have consistently been promised a more streamlined, expeditious process, it’s still a rarity.

Thankfully, there are a couple of bright spots.  The good news, is that if you loan is currently with Wells Fargo, but was originally with World Savings and Loan Association, World Savings Bank, or Goldenwest Financial you may very well be eligible for a unique short sale approval process rarely seen.

Darlene Lapeere with Wachovia (confused? Hang in there – World was bought by Wachovia, then Wells Fargo bought Wachovia) is their negotiator for Orange County short sales.  She spoke at a meeting I attended last week and shared their unique short sale process.   Here are the highlights:

• Approval can happen in as little as 48 hours thru 10 days, if going through their fast track process

• Foreclosure may be halted as late as the day before the Trustee Sale as long as there is a purchase contract (on a case-by-case basis)

• Applies to both Owner and Non-Owner Occupied

• You do not have to be delinquent

• Be aware, HAFA eligibility may delay the process

• Ms. Lapeere is the one and only single point of contact. No additional negoitiator is needed

• Will have to determine HAFA eligibility

• They will pay the 2nd lien holder up to 10% of the loan amount as long as the lien has existed on the subject property for 12 months or longer

• Must show evidence of a hardship

Obviously, lack of deliquency requirement, short processing, and the Non-owner occupied property eligibility make this a very unique program. Why is it so rare to see this?

Their ability to work in such a timely manner and with such unique terms is that these are portfolio loans – not loans sold in the secondary market. Often times, the lengthy periods are tied up in securing approval from multiple investors.

If you have questions about whether or not you might have one of these loans, and your are considering a short sale, please don’t hesitate to reach out to me or you may also email Ms. Lapeere with your address and loan number at darlene.lapeere@Wachovia.com.

Whattya know – you just might find a fast – a ‘short’ – short sale afterall.

What Happens When the Home You Are Renting Forecloses?

Tenant rights have been addressed in recently weeks under the ‘Helping Families Save Their Homes Act’.   On May 20th, 2009, Obama signed the new law that extends the rights of a tenant to stay in the foreclosed property from 60 days to 90 days.

Recently I had a client ask whether this would apply only to homes foreclosed from this date forward or those that have recently been foreclosed on.  From contacting various tenant’s rights groups, it looks as though the 90 days applies to homes foreclosed from May 20th, 2009 and forward, otherwise, it is still 60 days.

Also, it is worth noting that the  following language is included in the law:  “the lease or tenancy requires the receipt of rent that is not substantially less than fair market rent for the property.“  In other words, you still may be required to pay rent to the lender that now owns the property.

If you have questions about your rights, I’m happy to assist. You may also find assistance at various Tenant Advocacy sites.  For example, TenantsTogether.org, California’s Statewide Organization for Renters Rights.

Wagon Wheel is small community in Trabuco Canyon located off Oso Parkway not far from the south gate of Coto de Caza.  The homes were built in the mid 90′s by Kaufman & Broad who subsidized the original mello roos bonds making it known in part, for it’s very reasonable tax rate.

Homes range in size from the condos in the Dakotas (835 to 1,117 square feet) to the gated community of Stonecliff (up to just over 3,000 square feet).

Current market conditions in Wagon Wheel are not dissimilar to Orange County as a whole.  The upper price points remain very slow and the lower price points are plagued by distress inventory.

Market Conditions

Note that there is very little bank owned inventory on the market currently, but given the recent completion of the moratorium on foreclosures, we are seeing Notice of Defaults on the rise again and in the coming months, I expect to see bank owned homes back on the rise in Wagon Wheel and all over Orange County.

The highest sale year to date is in the California Laredo tract at $725,000 in February.  The next closest sale was $600,000.  The poor sale history for the upper price points is  not isolated to Wagon Wheel and is seen across the market due to the lack of available financing and buyer cautiousness.

The highest sale in the last 30 days was in the California Landmark tract, a traditional sale for $556,000.  Between $500,001 and $750,000, there are 5 available properties and 3 in escrow.

Under $500,000 is plagued by distress sales.  Currently 4 out of 5 active listings are short sales, yet the 4 equity sellers currently in escrow reflect the buyer demand – buyers are often reluctant to wait out the lengthy short sale process and opt for a traditional sale.

Questions?

If you are wondering how these statistics and trends impact your buying, or selling process, please don’t hesitate to let me know.  I’m always happy to help.  No pressure and no obligations.  I can be reached at (949) 939-2514 or emailed at linsey@ocrealestatevoice.com.

This information and stats are from SoCalMLS and are deemed reliable but not guaranteed.

During the final months of 2008, many lending institutions participated in a voluntary moratorium on foreclosures.  Notice of Defaults (NOD’s), the first step in the foreclosure process in California, plummeted.   The final days on the moratoriums have just passed.  Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac’s were lifted as of March 31.

And if you’ve been paying attention to my ‘Microscope on the Market’ series, you’ve noticed the drop in bank owned homes on the market – hence the second half of that headline, ‘Foreclosure Sales Drop’.  Without the new NOD’s, there’s been a dramatic reduction in bank owned homes.

Notice the following chart that tracks Notice of Defaults and Foreclosure sales.  The green line represents California’s NOD filings.  Notice the arrows – the dramatic dip in September and the sharp rise as of March ’09.

With the rise in filings, we can expect the foreclosures to rise.  Will Obama’s plan help?  My guess is no for Orange County.  Why?  The loan modifications the banks are offering, by and large, don’t change the significant negative equity that many of these homeowners are facing.  Without a substantial equity reduction, many sellers (who’ve already seen their credit damaged) will opt to walk away from the property.

What does this mean for buyers and sellers?  If we see a large rise in distress inventory, this market may see some downward pressure on pricing – although in some of the lower price points, overall inventory is still low (especially if you remove the difficult short sales).  I would expect that demand for this inventory will remain high – as we have seen in recent months.

One interesting note in the Foreclosure Radar report:

The California Foreclosure Prevention Act, which goes into effect this summer, adds an additional 90 days to the foreclosure process if lenders fail to take certain actions.  It is quite possible that the dramatic rise in foreclosure notices occuring now is an attempt by lenders to process as many foreclosures as possible before this law takes affect.

If you are interested in viewing foreclosure data and bank owned homes don’t hesitate to contact me.

One of my clients sent me a link to an article published online on CNBC about ‘Mortgage Re-Defaults Rising with No Sign of Slowing’.  The article states that, “…after 6 months, nearly 37 percent of mortgage loans modified in the first quarter were 60 or more days delinquent,”  and goes on to say that, “after three months, 19 percent were 60 or more days delinquent or in the process of foreclosure.”

There is no question that watching a family lose their home is beyond heartbreaking.  The article did point out a small piece of good news in this fiasco – 9 out of 10 home loans are current.

The article has me thinking about a few things.  Why does someone default?

The rates on the adjustables are actually lower in recent months than they were a year ago.  In addition to that, some of the Interest Only notes have yet to adjust at all.  Payments in many cases are the same, or even less than they were one year ago.

I’ve seen that in some instances, people frankly are not interested in paying $500,000 for a home that is now worth $375,000 and decide to walk away from the property.  Does a loan modification make sense for those owners?

Lending restrictions were way too lenient up until recently.  Some folks were approved for loans that they never would have qualified for under the strict requirements of today’s lending standards.  Does a loan modification make sense for those owners?

Temporarily reducing the interest rate, tacking on the arrears to the back-end of the loan may provide immediate relief but is it only delaying the inevitable?  Do loan modifications like this make sense?

Maybe it’s time to be honest and say that current levels of home ownership are higher than they’ve ever been, and just maybe, that isn’t a good thing.  It’s not good for the homeowners that aren’t really qualified, and it’s not good for the housing market.

Maybe it’s time to really help those homeowners get out from underneath the homes that they cannot sell for what they owe.  Maybe it’s time to let this market run it’s course without trying to fix it with band-aides and superglue.  Maybe it’s time to get a really efficient and effective short sale process to assist these distressed homeowners.

Bailout plans that focus on loan modifications and saving the homes may not necessarily be the answer.  As I’ve said before, where is a Bailout plan that really deals with the heart of the crisis?  Where is a plan that is effectively dealing with the real issues on Mainstreet?   I’m waiting…and not patiently.

I come across articles all day on the Internet and share with you those that I find most interesting or those that in which I feel compelled to share my 2 cents.  This article on foreclosures and pricing from early December on CNN Money, was sent to me by a past client that is selling a home out of the area.  She is also a buyer in Orange County and sees the significant impact that foreclosure pricing has on her view of traditional, or equity, sellers.

It creates an interesting dynamic for her – she is both a buyer and a seller in this market.  That dual role allows her a tremendous clarity in the ability to position her listing.  She knows that she must price it to compete with the distress inventory in her marketplace.

As a buyer, she is also seeing that the although distressed inventory in our marketplace is not always in great condition, the best deals are often in that sector of the market.

As stated by CNN Money, “In California, the median price for an REO listing was $259,000 during the week of November 10, 23% lower than the non-REOs on the market according to Trulia.com.”

With REO’s in the state priced 23% lower than the traditional seller, it definitely puts the price pressure on equity sellers.  You must price to compete.

That being said, I have noticed (and discussed here) that traditional sellers do seem to get a higher price per square foot ultimately.  The possible reasons?  Full disclosure from the seller about past problems, often superior condition, less competition with other buyers because many investors target foreclosures, and the ability to have a timely response to an offer as opposed to the lengthy one in short sale circumstances.

Bottom line – look at your competition.  Are there distressed properties in your sector of the market?  You may have a bit of an edge as an equity seller, but buyers are looking for a good deal.    If you want to sell, you must be perceived as a good deal with pricing that is competitive.

Ranked as number 6 for the worst real estate markets in the country was the Santa Ana – Anaheim area.  The Median sales price for 2008 was stated at $532,140.  The prediction for ’09 was a 23.7% decline.  The prediction for 2010 was a 3.5% decline.  If these predictions are accurate, that would leave us with the median sales price around $391,812 at the end of 2010.

Couple things to note from this report – it’s important again to remember the definition of median sales price as I discussed in my previous post.  We still have a tremendous amount of distress inventory to consume and  much of it is in the under $750,000 price points.

These bank owned properties and short sales that will make up a tremendous amount of our 2009 activity will result in a lower median sales price.  I am not saying that prices won’t decline, but again, it’s important to look at the meaning of these numbers in the right context.

The other question that I find confusing is what is meant by Santa Ana – Anaheim area.  Did they look at the numbers from those two metro areas?  They don’t appear to be referring to Orange County as a whole and Santa Ana has been in the top of the worst performing zip codes in the county so that I’m not sure we can say these are county wide predictions.  The news is not good nonetheless.

Other California cities that were facing some unpleasant predictions include Los Angeles (ranked as the worst real estate market in the country), Stockton, Riverside, Sacramento, Fresno, San Diego and Bakersfield.

The only two cities that were out of the Golden State were Miami – Miami Beach and Washington, D.C.

The Median Sale Price as reported by Dataquick for a home in the OC was $400,000 – which brings us back to May of 2003 if you’re tracking the bust backwards.  Lansner states, “That means that 53% of the 1996 to 2007 profit has evaporated.”

I found some other interesting tidbits on the DQNews site to report:

• 44.2% of sales in Orange County in the month of November were foreclosures.
• Sales volume is up 38.9% in November ’08 as compared to November ’07 numbers.
• Median sales price is down 31.4% from the median sales price in November ’07.

I want to draw your attention to one common misconception.  Take yourself back to your statistics class (come on now – don’t kick and scream like that – it will be a brief visit, I promise).  Remember the definition of median.  Dictionary.com defines ‘Median’ as “the middle number in a given sequence of numbers”.

Look at the above statistic and look at it with that definition now applied.  Median is not the average.  It just means that if there are 5 sales – the price of the number 3 sale is the median home price.

You cannot draw the conclusion that prices have all fallen 31.4% when comparing November ’07 and ’08 median home price figures.  Remember that 44.2% of the sales in November were foreclosures.  Much of the movement in our market is in the lower price points and in the most distressed price points – hence a lower median price.

Median home price is still a valuable indicator in the market but you must be careful of the conclusion you draw from the information.  There is no denying prices have fallen precipitously.  But, I do think it’s important to evaluate the numbers in the right context.

Okay – statistics class dismissed.

This particular buyer is looking in Mission Viejo between $450,000 and $550,000.  He wants a single family residence.  With that criteria, I hit the MLS looking for a picture of where we really are. 

As many of you know, I’m the last person to jump on the ‘Hurry Buy Now’ band wagon.  However, if you are in this price range in South Orange County – this is speaking to you.  What did I find?

There are 40 Active single family residences currently listed in Mission Viejo between $450,000 and $550,000.  How do those breakdown?

• 19 are short sales (BTW – refer to my posts on shorts sales to understand the challenges with these sales)
• 4 Bank Owned
• 17 are supposedly equity sellers.  Upon further reading of the agent remarks in the listings 2 more of these are actually short sales and 1 is bank owned.

So, what does this leave us?  14 Traditional, Equity Sellers?  I should add 5 of these 14 are 55+ communities.  There are really only 9 equity sellers in my client’s search criteria out of 40.

It then becomes important to analyze the recent resale activity.  I pulled sales from the last 30 days with the same criteria - Mission Viejo, single family residences, $450 to $550.  Here are the stats:

• 21 Sales
• 6 Bank Owned
• 3 Short Sales
• 13 Traditional Sales (one 55+ community sale)

No rocket scientist needed here.  This is out of balance.

If you are not a numbers person, it’s okay, just try to stick with me here – 52.5% of the Active Inventory are short sales, but last month only 14.3% of the sales were short sales.

12.5% of the Active Inventory is bank owned, but last month 28.6% of the sales were bank owned.

And most telling, 22.5% of the Active Inventory are equity sellers (not to include senior communities), yet the sales from the last 30 days indicate that 51.1% were traditional sellers.

I’m actually not a numbers guru.  I love reading.  I love writing.  But, I also love logic and this should speak volumes to you.  The sellers that don’t have to sell have chosen not to; they’ve heard the message.  Buyers that have been fence sitting or have had affordability problems, have found that it is indeed their time.  Demand does exist.  The inventory may actually be lacking.  Do I hear – supply and demand?

Just to temper my enthusiasm, let’s look the sales prices.  No question – these are some other stats to consider from the last 30 days with that same criteria:

Short Sales – Sold at 98.29% of asking price with an average days on market of 143.  The average price per square foot was $253.09

Bank Owned - Sold at 101.55% of asking price with an average of 16 days on the market.  The average price per square foot was $263.06.

Traditional Sellers -Sold at 97.38% of asking price with an average of 34 days on the market.  The average price per square foot was $323.09.

I will suspect that the knee jerk response is that traditional sellers are overpriced on a per square foot basis – but look at the demand.   There’s a reason these are selling.  They are in superior condition (sometimes by a lot) and you can actually submit an offer to a live body, that has real emotion, and a desire to sell.  What’s the value in that?

So, if you think it’s a buyers’ market, think carefully and ask for the stats.  You need more than a cursory overview.  You need to drill down into the makeup of what it means to get a clear picture of the marketplace.

This is one picture of the OC marketplace, but from what I’m seeing, in certain pricepoints, it’s not isolated.  Thoughts?  I’m open to our interpretation of these numbers.